[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjxjzpwn.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:24:56 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Genes Lists <lists@...ience.com>, Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, bingbu.cao@...el.com, Rodrigo Vivi
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Linux 6.12.4 - crash dma_alloc_attrs+0x12b via ipu6
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Genes Lists <lists@...ience.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 10:58 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > ...
>> > > FYI 6.12.4 got a crash shortly after booting in dma_alloc_attrs -
>> > > maybe
>> > > triggered in ipu6_probe. Crash only happened on laptop with ipu6.
>> > > All
>> > > other machines are running fine.
>> >
>> > Have you read the dmesg further than the IPU6 related warning? The
>> > IPU6
>> > driver won't work (maybe not even probe?) but if the system
>> > crashes, it
>> > appears unlikely the IPU6 drivers would have something to do with
>> > that.
>> > Look for warnings on linked list corruption later, they seem to be
>> > coming
>> > from the i915 driver.
>>
>> And the list corruption is actually happening in
>> cpu_latency_qos_update_request(). I don't see any i915 changes in
>> 6.12.4
>> that could cause it.
>>
>> I guess the question is, when did it work? Did 6.12.3 work?
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>
>
> - 6.12.1 worked
>
> - mainline - works (but only with i915 patch set [1] otherwise there
> are no graphics at all)
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141911/
>
> - 6.12.3 - crashed (i see i915 not ipu6) and again it has
> cpu_latency_qos_update_request+0x61/0xc0
Thanks for testing.
There are no changes to either i915 or kernel/power between 6.12.1 and
6.12.4.
There are some changes to drm core, but none that could explain this.
Maybe try the same kernels a few more times to see if it's really
deterministic? Not that I have obvious ideas where to go from there, but
it's a clue nonetheless.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists