[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241210125737.786928-5-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:57:34 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
hch@....de, ritesh.list@...il.com
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] xfs: Add extent zeroing support for atomic writes
An atomic write which spans mixed unwritten and mapped extents would be
rejected. This is one reason why atomic write unit min and max is
currently fixed at the block size.
To enable large atomic writes, any unwritten extents need to be zeroed
before issuing the atomic write. So call iomap_dio_zero_unwritten() for
this scenario and retry the atomic write.
It can be detected if there is any unwritten extents by passing
IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY to the original iomap_dio_rw() call.
After iomap_dio_zero_unwritten() is called then iomap_dio_rw() is retried -
if that fails then there really is something wrong.
Note that this change will result in a latent change of behaviour, in that
atomic writing a single unwritten block will now mean pre-zeroing.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 4a0b7de4f7ae..f2b2eb2dee94 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -578,10 +578,47 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
return error;
}
+static int
+xfs_dio_write_end_zero_unwritten(
+ struct kiocb *iocb,
+ ssize_t size,
+ int error,
+ unsigned flags)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
+ loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
+ unsigned int nofs_flag;
+
+ trace_xfs_end_io_direct_write(ip, offset, size);
+
+ if (xfs_is_shutdown(ip->i_mount))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!size))
+ return 0;
+ if (!(flags & IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Same as xfs_dio_write_end_io() ... */
+ nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
+
+ error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, offset, size, true);
+
+ memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
+ return error;
+}
+
static const struct iomap_dio_ops xfs_dio_write_ops = {
.end_io = xfs_dio_write_end_io,
};
+static const struct iomap_dio_ops xfs_dio_zero_ops = {
+ .end_io = xfs_dio_write_end_zero_unwritten,
+};
+
/*
* Handle block aligned direct I/O writes
*/
@@ -619,6 +656,52 @@ xfs_file_dio_write_aligned(
return ret;
}
+static noinline ssize_t
+xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(
+ struct xfs_inode *ip,
+ struct kiocb *iocb,
+ struct iov_iter *from)
+{
+ unsigned int iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
+ bool do_zero = false;
+ ssize_t ret;
+
+retry:
+ ret = xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write(iocb, &iolock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = xfs_file_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ if (do_zero) {
+ ret = iomap_dio_zero_unwritten(iocb, from,
+ &xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops,
+ &xfs_dio_zero_ops);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ trace_xfs_file_direct_write(iocb, from);
+ ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, &xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops,
+ &xfs_dio_write_ops, IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY, NULL, 0);
+
+ if (do_zero && ret < 0)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN && !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)) {
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
+ do_zero = true;
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+out_unlock:
+ if (iolock)
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Handle block unaligned direct I/O writes
*
@@ -723,6 +806,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
return -EINVAL;
if ((iocb->ki_pos | count) & ip->i_mount->m_blockmask)
return xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(ip, iocb, from);
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
+ return xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(ip, iocb, from);
return xfs_file_dio_write_aligned(ip, iocb, from);
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists