linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add SAMA7D65 PMC compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fb11338b-986f-4a9a-a0dd-e8f4e63941aa@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:25:32 -0700
From: Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@...rochip.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	<arnd@...db.de>, <dharma.b@...rochip.com>, <mihai.sain@...rochip.com>,
	<romain.sioen@...rochip.com>, <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add SAMA7D65 PMC compatible
 string

On 12/10/24 09:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 12:59:52PM -0700, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
>> From: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Add the `microchip,sama7d65-pmc` compatible string to the existing binding,
>> since the SAMA7D65 PMC shares the same properties and clock requirements
>> as the SAMA7G5.
>>
>> Export MCK3 and MCK5 to be accessed and referenced in DT to assign to
>> the clocks property for sama7d65 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> 
> Missing Conor's ack.
I removed the ack because I have changed the original patch that was
acked. Should the ack not have been removed even though the original
patch as been changed?