lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ho71ifcqk.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:41:55 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Dhruva Gole
 <d-gole@...com>, Akashdeep Kaur <a-kaur@...com>, Sebin Francis
 <sebin.francis@...com>, Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] pmdomain: ti_sci: collect and send low-power
 mode constraints

Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:

> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 23:13, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>>
>> The latest (10.x) version of the firmware for the PM co-processor (aka
>> device manager, or DM) adds support for a "managed" mode, where the DM
>> firmware will select the specific low power state which is entered
>> when Linux requests a system-wide suspend.
>>
>> In this mode, the DM will always attempt the deepest low-power state
>> available for the SoC.
>>
>> However, Linux (or OSes running on other cores) may want to constrain
>> the DM for certain use cases.  For example, the deepest state may have
>> a wakeup/resume latency that is too long for certain use cases.  Or,
>> some wakeup-capable devices may potentially be powered off in deep
>> low-power states, but if one of those devices is enabled as a wakeup
>> source, it should not be powered off.
>>
>> These kinds of constraints are are already known in Linux by the use
>> of existing APIs such as per-device PM QoS and device wakeup APIs, but
>> now we need to communicate these constraints to the DM.
>>
>> For TI SoCs with TI SCI support, all DM-managed devices will be
>> connected to a TI SCI PM domain.  So the goal of this series is to use
>> the PM domain driver for TI SCI devices to collect constraints, and
>> communicate them to the DM via the new TI SCI APIs.
>>
>> This is all managed by TI SCI PM domain code.  No new APIs are needed
>> by Linux drivers.  Any device that is managed by TI SCI will be
>> checked for QoS constraints or wakeup capability and the constraints
>> will be collected and sent to the DM.
>>
>> This series depends on the support for the new TI SCI APIs (v10) and
>> was also tested with this series to update 8250_omap serial support
>> for AM62x[2].
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240801195422.2296347-1-msp@baylibre.com
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240807141227.1093006-1-msp@baylibre.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> - fix build warning on arm32 when building with W=1 and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n
>> - rebase onto v6.13-rc1
>> - fix latency units: convert usecs (PM QoS) to msecs (TI SCI)
>> - all dependencies are now merged in v6.13-rc1
>> - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241101-lpm-v6-10-constraints-pmdomain-v5-0-3011aa04622f@baylibre.com
>
> v6 applied for next and by amending patch1 to deal with the sorting of
> include files, thanks!

Thank you for the fixuup.

Kevin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ