linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: pf9453: add new PMIC PF9453 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241211163557.GA3256322-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:35:57 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: pf9453: add new PMIC PF9453
 support

On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>
> 
> Support new bindings PMIC PF9453, which is totally difference with existed
> PCA9450, so create new file for it.

You say that, but it is all the same custom properties as 
nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml. It's only differring numbers of LDO and 
BUCK regulators AFAICT. It should be one schema.

Rob