[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241211184227.7a843ac0@jic23-huawei>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:42:27 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] iio: accel: adxl345: rename variable data to
st
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:57 +0100
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 17:13:35 +0000
> > Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Rename the locally used variable data to st. The st refers to "state",
> > > representing the internal state of the driver object. Further it
> > > prepares the usage of an internal data pointer needed for the
> > > implementation of the sensor features.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
> > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. Initially pushed out as testing
> > to let the bots take a look.
>
> Should I actually drop the "applied" patches in a v6? Or, may I keep them?
Rebase on top of my testing branch or just drop them. Either works.
>
> I see that Dan Carpenters smatch now comes up with some issues. So, do
> the fixes go into v6 here, or better separate?
If for things I've picked up, then separate fixup at the beginning of
your v6. I might squash them into original patches if I haven't pushed
out as togreg yet or they are particularly bad and I think worth potentially
work giving others a messy rebase.
Jonathan
>
> Best,
> L
Powered by blists - more mailing lists