lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyq12wv7rEU9Bv44S8Hp8amziLxhiS0uX9_6qYQr_eN0uFRMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:34:49 -0800
From: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, 
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	Marco Vanotti <mvanotti@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: mremap: Allow new_addr to be specified as a hint

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 1:31 PM Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> When using MREMAP_MAYMOVE previously the new_addr was ignored unless
> the user specified MREMAP_FIXED. This change will allow it to be
> used as a hint in that situation similar to how mmap(2) behaves.
>
> get_unmapped_area() will handle page aligning the new address hint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
> ---
>  mm/mremap.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> index fdc1b0f1b38e..1d2522fba0ef 100644
> --- a/mm/mremap.c
> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> @@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len,
>                 if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
>                         map_flags |= MAP_SHARED;
>
> -               new_addr = get_unmapped_area(vma->vm_file, 0, new_len,
> +               new_addr = get_unmapped_area(vma->vm_file, new_addr, new_len,

Marco raised the concern that since glibc [1] handles new_addr as a
variadic argument, existing call sites which used only MREMAP_MAYMOVE
might end up passing garbage to the glibc wrapper for new_addr. I
checked and it turns out that musl does the same [2]. So I'm not sure
how this could ever be safely implemented? Worst case scenario we're
leaking stack data as a hint to mremap, yikes.

1. https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mremap.c
2. https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/mman/mremap.c

>                                         vma->vm_pgoff +
>                                         ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT),
>                                         map_flags);
> --
> 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ