[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvogDJN8YhDx4QMDTakUZohv7yAa_UreMCRg+RiZuTNhgJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:11:22 -0800
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf trace: Add tests for BTF general augmentation
Hello Namhyung,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:30 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:32:56PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > Currently, we only have perf trace augmentation tests for enum
> > arguments. This patch adds tests for more general syscall arguments,
> > such as struct pointers, strings, and buffers.
> >
> > These tests utilize the perf config system to configure the perf trace
> > output, as suggested by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> >
> > Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..903310b355c4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# perf trace BTF general tests
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +err=0
> > +set -e
> > +
> > +. "$(dirname $0)"/lib/probe.sh
> > +skip_if_no_perf_trace || exit 2
>
> The kernel might not have BPF/BTF support. I think you can check if
> /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux is there and skip the test if not.
My bad, I will add the check to it.
Thanks,
Howard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists