[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6221fc3d-0b1a-4e91-9e34-a32f3c77b63f@igalia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:35:36 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Xinhui Pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>, Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>,
joshua@...ggi.es, Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@...il.com>,
Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>, ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] drm/atomic: Ease async flip restrictions
Hi Dmitry,
Em 11/12/2024 16:35, Dmitry Baryshkov escreveu:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:25:07AM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The goal of this work is to find a nice way to allow amdgpu to perform
>> async page flips in the overlay plane as well, not only on the primary
>> one. Currently, when using the atomic uAPI, this is the only type of
>> plane allowed to do async flips, and every driver accepts it.
>>
>> This patchset re-uses the per-plane function atomic_async_check() to
>> this purpose, so drivers can allow different plane types. There's a
>> `bool flip` parameter so the atomic_async_check() can do different
>> decisions if it's a complete page flip or a plane update.
>>
>> igt test: https://lore.kernel.org/igt-dev/20241211031820.115844-1-andrealmeid@igalia.com/
>>
>> Changelog
>> v9: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241101-tonyk-async_flip-v9-0-681814efbfbe@igalia.com
>> - Add a 'flip' flag to indicate where the atomic_async_check() is being called from.
>
> I think something went wrong. There is no changelog for v10 and also no
> tags that you've got for v9.
>
I have type the numbers wrongly, this is the changelog for v10, but I
forgot the tags, I will send a v11 with the correct changelog and tags.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists