linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z1lCnEr25fOB8RWI@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:43:24 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>
Cc: void@...ifault.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	changwoo@...lia.com, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock_update/stale()

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:15:27PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
...
> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_stale(struct rq *rq)

Would scx_rq_clock_expire() or scx_rq_clock_invalidate() be a better name?
Also, I'd roll this patch into the next one.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun