[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a91a3993-6c81-4abc-8609-8f41804fdf62@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:14:52 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] media: ipu-bridge: Remove unneeded conditional
compilations
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 09:48:54AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Yet, based on the title, enforced by its description:
>
> > One of the quirks that we introduced to build with !ACPI && COMPILE_TEST
> > throws the following smatch warning:
> > drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c:752 ipu_bridge_ivsc_is_ready() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented
>
> I don't think it makes sense to c/c stable, as this is just a smatch
> warning, for a configuration that will never be used in production.
Yes. Plus that check has a lot of false positives if you don't have the cross
function DB enabled. I thought I had fixed it, but I still need to work on it
more.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists