lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3535b6a-8bd9-4ab8-a2a1-8919927af9f1@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:13:47 +0800
From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
 tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6
 addr client for smc-r v2



On 2024/12/12 20:49, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 12/11/24 19:54, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:30:55 +0800
>> Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>> AF_INET6 is not supported for smc-r v2 client before, even if the
>>> ipv6 addr is ipv4 mapped. Thus, when using AF_INET6, smc-r connection
>>> will fallback to tcp, especially for java applications running smc-r.
>>> This patch support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2. Clients
>>> using real global ipv6 addr is still not supported yet.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Sorry for the late remark, but does this need a Fixes tag? I mean
>> my gut feeling is that this is a bugfix -- i.e. should have been
>> working from the get go -- and not a mere enhancement. No strong
>> opinions here.
> 
> FTR: my take is this is really a new feature, as the ipv6 support for
> missing from the smc-r v2 introduction and sub-system maintainers
> already implicitly agreed on that via RB tags.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> /P

Agree.
This patch enlarges the scope of using SMCRv2, so I think it is a new feature.

Thanks,
Guangguan Wang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ