[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9mTEcRg6=ZiYFX3ebHSYgMwTv692ufUdTCoA1vX5E1nNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:24:44 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] rust: xarray: Add an abstraction for XArray
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 8:40 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This coding style is pretty far in the functional programming camp
> compared to the rest of Rust code in the kernel. I tend to stick with
> a more imperative style to be more familiar to C folks.
That's a fair assessment, but it's a subjective area -- Andreas was
fond of the approach (in a preview review).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists