[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241213025555.113779-1-jinjian.song@fibocom.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:55:55 +0800
From: Jinjian Song <jinjian.song@...ocom.com>
To: mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com,
Jinjian Song <jinjian.song@...ocom.com>,
chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com,
chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
haijun.liu@...iatek.com,
m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com,
ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com,
loic.poulain@...aro.org,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
corbet@....net,
danielwinkler@...gle.com,
helgaas@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org,
korneld@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v1] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix FSM command timeout issue
From: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
>On 12/12/2024 11:55 AM, Jinjian Song wrote:
>> When driver processes the internal state change command, it use
>> asynchronous thread to process the command operation. If the main
>> thread detects that the task has timed out, the asynchronous thread
>> will panic when executing te completion notification because the
>> main thread completion object is released.
>>
>[...]
>If this is a fix then should be targeted to net and not net-next
>and probably should have Fixes: tag.
Hi Mateusz,
Please let me request to net and add the Fixes: tag.
Thanks.
Jinjian,
Best Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists