[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9=_nO292bvG=ir1o8dLvc=MGdT__m0pU48-qn6YdwSJVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:54:53 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] rust: xarray: Add an abstraction for XArray
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:24 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It is also advantageous for the submitter, because one wants reviewers
> to have the easiest time possible reading your code, and reviewers
> will be, in some cases, new to Rust.
Implicit in this statement is the assumption that while new to Rust,
those reviewers will not be new to C.
Anyway, I'm not emotionally attached to this style. Would you prefer I
rewrite it using loops and conditionals? Whatever helps this land, I
will do.
Tamir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists