[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1x6ti2KaMdKS1Hn@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:19:34 +0100
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] Revert "power: sequencing: request the WLAN enable
GPIO as-is"
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 03:12:51PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> This reverts commit a9aaf1ff88a8cb99a1335c9eb76de637f0cf8c10.
>
> With the changes recently merged into the PCI/pwrctrl/ we now have
> correct ordering between the pwrseq provider and the PCI-pwrctrl
> consumers. With that, the pwrseq WCN driver no longer needs to leave the
> GPIO state as-is and we can remove the workaround.
>
Should probably revert commit d8b762070c3f ("power: sequencing:
qcom-wcn: set the wlan-enable GPIO to output") as well?
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qcom-wcn.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qcom-wcn.c b/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qcom-wcn.c
> index 682a9beac69eb..bb8c47280b7bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qcom-wcn.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qcom-wcn.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int pwrseq_qcom_wcn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "Failed to get the Bluetooth enable GPIO\n");
>
> ctx->wlan_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "wlan-enable",
> - GPIOD_ASIS);
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> if (IS_ERR(ctx->wlan_gpio))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->wlan_gpio),
> "Failed to get the WLAN enable GPIO\n");
> --
> 2.30.2
>
I'm not sure why but applying this patch brings back the error I had
before. It does seem like setting wlan-enable GPIO happens early enough,
but maybe some timing is still wrong.
[ 17.132161] <gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->wlan_gpio, 1);>
[ 17.480619] ath12k_pci 0004:01:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci: failed with rc=134
[ 17.491997] ath12k_pci 0004:01:00.0: pci device id mismatch: 0xffff 0x1107
[ 17.492000] ath12k_pci 0004:01:00.0: failed to claim device: -5
[ 17.492075] ath12k_pci 0004:01:00.0: probe with driver ath12k_pci failed with error -5
Any ideas/suggestions?
Thanks,
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists