[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1908542.tdWV9SEqCh@diego>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:22:52 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@...il.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@...il.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Firefly ITX-3588J board
Hi,
Am Freitag, 13. Dezember 2024, 19:08:55 CET schrieb Shimrra Shai:
> Document the compatibles for the new board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> index 753199a12..9ee96acdc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> @@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ properties:
> - const: firefly,firefly-rk3399
> - const: rockchip,rk3399
>
> + - description: Firefly ITX-3588J
> + items:
> + - const: firefly,itx-3588j
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588
> +
looking at the product-page, this is not _one_ complete board. Instead
it seems to be a system-on-module + baseboard design.
It looks like it uses the Core-3588J system-on-module [0].
We already have a number of those in the binding file to take as example
on how to structure that. For example FriendlyElec CM3588-based boards .
So you could do
- description: Firefly Core-3588J-based boards
items:
- enum:
- firefly,itx-3588j
- const: firefly,core-rk3588j
- const: rockchip,rk3588
Thanks
Heiko
[0] https://en.t-firefly.com/product/core/core3588j
Powered by blists - more mailing lists