[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213040001.jaqeuxyuhcc73ihg@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:30:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 CPUFreq SMCCC driver
On 12-12-24, 13:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 22:16, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
> Hmm, it looks like this needs to be moved and possibly split up.
>
> The provider part (for the clock and power-domain) belongs in
> /drivers/pmdomain/*, along with the other power-domain providers.
>
> Other than that, I was really expecting the cpufreq-dt to take care of the rest.
>
> To me, the above code belongs in a power-domain provider driver. While
> the below should be taken care of in cpufreq-dt, except for the device
> registration of the cpufreq-dt device, I guess.
>
> Viresh, what's your view on this?
Sure, no issues.. These are all cpufreq related, but don't necessarily belong in
the cpufreq directory.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists