[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb6f17b7-8ee1-4197-afb6-923b372965c2@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:37:28 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf script: Fix output type for dynamically allocated
core PMU's
Hi Thomas,
> @@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static int evsel_script__fprintf(struct evsel_script *es, FILE *fp)
>
> static inline int output_type(unsigned int type)
> {
> + struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> +
> switch (type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_SYNTH:
> return OUTPUT_TYPE_SYNTH;
> @@ -394,6 +396,10 @@ static inline int output_type(unsigned int type)
> return type;
> }
>
> + pmu = perf_pmus__find_by_type(type);
> + if (pmu && pmu->is_core)
> + return PERF_TYPE_RAW;
Minor nit ...
output_type() seems to be getting called a lot. For ex, for a perf.data
with 4530 samples, output_type() was called 181246 times when I ran
"perf script". IIUC, this pmu lookup is unnecessary for homogeneous
platforms? If so, can we make it conditional?
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists