lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1734075432-14131-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:37:12 +0800
From: yangge1116@....com
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	21cnbao@...il.com,
	david@...hat.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz,
	liuzixing@...on.cn,
	yangge <yangge1116@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, compaction: don't use ALLOC_CMA in long term GUP flow

From: yangge <yangge1116@....com>

Since commit 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags
in __compaction_suitable()") allow compaction to proceed when free
pages required for compaction reside in the CMA pageblocks, it's
possible that __compaction_suitable() always returns true, and in
some cases, it's not acceptable.

There are 4 NUMA nodes on my machine, and each NUMA node has 32GB
of memory. I have configured 16GB of CMA memory on each NUMA node,
and starting a 32GB virtual machine with device passthrough is
extremely slow, taking almost an hour.

During the start-up of the virtual machine, it will call
pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to allocate memory.
Long term GUP cannot allocate memory from CMA area, so a maximum
of 16 GB of no-CMA memory on a NUMA node can be used as virtual
machine memory. Since there is 16G of free CMA memory on the NUMA
node, watermark for order-0 always be met for compaction, so
__compaction_suitable() always returns true, even if the node is
unable to allocate non-CMA memory for the virtual machine.

For costly allocations, because __compaction_suitable() always
returns true, __alloc_pages_slowpath() can't exit at the appropriate
place, resulting in excessively long virtual machine startup times.
Call trace:
__alloc_pages_slowpath
    if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED ||
        compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
        goto nopage; // should exit __alloc_pages_slowpath() from here

To sum up, during long term GUP flow, we should remove ALLOC_CMA
both in __compaction_suitable() and __isolate_free_page().

Fixes: 984fdba6a32e ("mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags in __compaction_suitable()")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge1116@....com>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 8 +++++---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 07bd227..044c2247 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -2384,6 +2384,7 @@ static bool __compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
 				  unsigned long wmark_target)
 {
 	unsigned long watermark;
+	bool pin;
 	/*
 	 * Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction to be able to
 	 * isolate free pages for migration targets. This means that the
@@ -2395,14 +2396,15 @@ static bool __compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order,
 	 * even if compaction succeeds.
 	 * For costly orders, we require low watermark instead of min for
 	 * compaction to proceed to increase its chances.
-	 * ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in CMA pageblocks are considered
-	 * suitable migration targets
+	 * In addition to long term GUP flow, ALLOC_CMA is used, as pages in
+	 * CMA pageblocks are considered suitable migration targets
 	 */
 	watermark = (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
 				low_wmark_pages(zone) : min_wmark_pages(zone);
 	watermark += compact_gap(order);
+	pin = !!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN);
 	return __zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, highest_zoneidx,
-				   ALLOC_CMA, wmark_target);
+				   pin ? 0 : ALLOC_CMA, wmark_target);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index dde19db..9a5dfda 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2813,6 +2813,7 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 {
 	struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
 	int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
+	bool pin;
 
 	if (!is_migrate_isolate(mt)) {
 		unsigned long watermark;
@@ -2823,7 +2824,8 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 		 * exists.
 		 */
 		watermark = zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN] + (1UL << order);
-		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, ALLOC_CMA))
+		pin = !!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN);
+		if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, pin ? 0 : ALLOC_CMA))
 			return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ