linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bf8a3eb3-ae11-4441-9207-d7241939d359@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:16:02 +0900
From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>
Cc: void@...ifault.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
 kernel-dev@...lia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock_update/stale()

Hello,

On 24. 12. 11. 16:43, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:15:27PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> ...
>> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_stale(struct rq *rq)
> 
> Would scx_rq_clock_expire() or scx_rq_clock_invalidate() be a better name?
> Also, I'd roll this patch into the next one.

Thank you for the suggestion. I will change it to
scx_rq_clock_invalidate() in the next version.

Regards,
Changwoo Min