[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a47b567d-96a6-4a87-9f60-33a311c281ae@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:45:19 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Mingwei Zheng <zmw12306@...il.com>, antonio.borneo@...s.st.com
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, make24@...as.ac.cn, peng.fan@....com,
fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pinctrl: stm32: Add check for clk_enable()
On 12/13/24 2:09 AM, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@ static int stm32_gpiolib_register_bank(struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl, struct fwnode
> return 0;
>
> err_clk:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(bank->clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pctl->clks[pctl->nbanks].clk);
Should this be
-clk_disable_unprepare(pctl->clks[pctl->nbanks].clk);
+clk_disable_unprepare(pctl->clks[bank->bank_nr].clk);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
?
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -1617,10 +1617,18 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> pctl->banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->banks),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pctl->banks)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + pctl->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->clks),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pctl->clks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < banks; ++i)
i++
Powered by blists - more mailing lists