[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1wejvFpGLFMhLJ9@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:46:22 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy2@...soprasteria.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] soc/qman: test: Use kthread_run_on_cpu()
Le Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:27:03AM +0000, LEROY Christophe a écrit :
>
>
> Le 11/12/2024 à 16:40, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit :
> > Use the proper API instead of open coding it.
> >
> > However it looks like kthreads here could be replaced by the use of a
> > per-cpu workqueue instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Thanks! Feel free to apply this patch to your tree as it's a pretty
standalone change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists