linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/772] 6.1.120-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024121342-fastball-batting-c80b@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:33:38 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/772] 6.1.120-rc1 review

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 01:38:31PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/12/24 06:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.120 release.
> > There are 772 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:41:35 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.120-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
> BMIPS_GENERIC:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
> 
> There is a new warning though:
> 
> scripts/mod/modpost.c:969:44: warning: excess elements in array initializer
>   969 |         .good_tosec = {ALL_TEXT_SECTIONS , NULL},
>       |                                            ^~~~
> scripts/mod/modpost.c:969:44: note: (near initialization for
> ‘sectioncheck[10].good_tosec’)
>   HOSTLD  scripts/mod/modpost

I thought I saw that but kind of ignored it, but in looking at it
further, it's not good at all.  Let me go fix this up, for some reason
we have "too many" entries in this list and so we could flow over the
end of the buffer here...

thanks,

greg k-h