lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <409678b0-339e-4d93-86f1-117d358a2d33@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:42:52 +0800
From: Jie Gan <quic_jiegan@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        "Aiqun Yu (Maria)"
	<quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "Konrad
 Dybcio" <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add coresight nodes for QCS8300



On 12/13/2024 8:35 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9.12.2024 3:01 AM, Jie Gan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/8/2024 12:28 AM, Aiqun Yu (Maria) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/5/2024 4:44 PM, Jie Gan wrote:
>>>> Add following coresight components for QCS8300 platform.
>>>> It includes CTI, dummy sink, dynamic Funnel, Replicator, STM,
>>>> TPDM, TPDA and TMC ETF.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <quic_jiegan@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in V2:
>>>> 1. Rebased on tag next-20241204.
>>>> 2. Padding the register address to 8 bits.
>>>> Link to V1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240929-add_coresight_devices_for_qcs8300-v1-1-4f14e8cb8955@quicinc.com/
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi | 2150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 2150 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> index 73abf2ef9c9f..eaec674950d8 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> @@ -293,6 +293,18 @@ system_sleep: domain-sleep {
>>>>            };
>>>>        };
>>>>    +    dummy_eud: dummy-sink {
>>>> +        compatible = "arm,coresight-dummy-sink";
>>>> +
>>>> +        in-ports {
>>>> +            port {
>>>> +                eud_in: endpoint {
>>>> +                    remote-endpoint = <&swao_rep_out1>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +            };
>>>> +        };
>>>> +    };
>>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +        tpdm@...c000 {
>>>> +            compatible = "qcom,coresight-tpdm", "arm,primecell";
>>>> +            reg = <0x0 0x0482c000 0x0 0x1000>;
>>>> +
>>>> +            clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
>>>> +            clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>>>> +
>>>> +            qcom,dsb-element-bits = <32>;
>>>> +            qcom,dsb-msrs-num = <32>;
>>>> +            status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> Could you please provide more detailed information on why some TPDM
>>> nodes are disabled by default while others are not?
>> Some of TPDM nodes are disabled by default because the one of the following reasons:
>> 1. TPDM device are designed to generate HW events, it needs a clock source to read&write its registers. Coresight driver cannot control the clock source ouside AP core, so those TPDM devices without enabled clock source will crash device in probe.
>> 2. Some of TPDM devices can't bootup with fused devices.
>> 3. Some of TPDM devices have known hardware issues that not resolved.
>>
>> I put those disabled TPDM devices in DT in case some of them may be "fixed" in future.
> 
> Please mark them as
> 
> /* Hardware issues */
> status = "fail";
> 

Maybe I should remove these devices, to avoid confusion. Is that ok?

> Konrad

Thanks,
Jie



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ