[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213184253.7c8203ce@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:42:53 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race
condition between reference pointers
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:35:03 +0000 Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
wrote:
> >> start_xmit runs in BH / softirq context. You can't take sleeping locks.
> >> The lock has to be a spin lock. You could possibly try to use the
> >> existing spin lock of the tx queue (__netif_tx_lock()) but that may be
> >> more challenging to do cleanly from within a library..
> > Thanks for the input. Yes, it looks like implementing a spin lock would
> > be a right choice. I will implement it and do the testing as you
> > suggested below and share the feedback.
> I tried using spin_lock_bh() variants (as the softirq involved) on both
> start_xmit() and spi_thread() where the critical regions need to be
> protected and tested by enabling the Kconfigs in the
> kernel/configs/debug.config. Didn't notice any warnings in the dmesg log.
>
> Note: Prior to the above test, purposefully I tried with spin_lock()
> variants on both the sides to check/simulate for the warnings using
> Kconfigs kernel/configs/debug.config. Got some warnings in the dmesg
> regarding deadlock which clarified the expected behavior. And then I
> proceeded with the above fix and it worked as expected.
>
> If you agree, I will prepare the next version with this fix and post.
Go ahead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists