linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/467] 6.12.5-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241214065653.GA29240@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:53 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/467] 6.12.5-rc2 review

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.5 release.
> There are 467 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Dec 2024 14:57:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.5-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Booted on Radxa E52C (arm64) using pcie, rtl8125b(r8169), eMMC(dwmmc),
usb(xhci-hcd) + cdc_acm, i2c rtc. Looks good.

Tested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

Willy