linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf: fix wrong copied

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ttb6w136.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:50:37 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,  martin.lau@...ux.dev,  ast@...nel.org,
  edumazet@...gle.com,  davem@...emloft.net,  dsahern@...nel.org,
  kuba@...nel.org,  pabeni@...hat.com,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  song@...nel.org,  john.fastabend@...il.com,  andrii@...nel.org,
  mhal@...x.co,  yonghong.song@...ux.dev,  daniel@...earbox.net,
  xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,  horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and
 add tests

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 11:27 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:

[...]

> We added test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
> sockmap_basic. This is because we need to add more test cases for
> strparser in the future.
>
> Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
>
> ---

I have a question unrelated to the fix itself -

Are you an active strparser+verdict sockmap user?

I was wondering if we can deprecate strparser if/when KCM time comes
[1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iK60jxsJCzq29WPSZJnYNHHpPS09_ZmSi1JHmbkZ2GznA@mail.gmail.com/