[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1zVc-sSJ8BHdvYJ@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:46:43 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, g@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: clear vcpu->run->hypercall.ret before exiting
for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> QEMU up to 9.2.0 is assuming that vcpu->run->hypercall.ret is 0 on exit and
> it never modifies it when processing KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. Make this explicit
> in the code, to avoid breakage when KVM starts modifying that field.
>
> This in principle is not a good idea... It would have been much better if
> KVM had set the field to -KVM_ENOSYS from the beginning, so that a dumb
> userspace that does nothing on KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL would tell the guest it
> does not support KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE. However, breaking userspace is
> a Very Bad Thing, as everybody should know.
>
> Reported-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 943bd074a5d3..9ffb0fb5aacd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -3634,6 +3634,13 @@ static int snp_begin_psc_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 ghcb_msr)
>
> vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
> + /*
> + * In principle this should have been -KVM_ENOSYS, but userspace (QEMU <=9.2)
> + * assumed that vcpu->run->hypercall.ret is never changed by KVM and thus that
> + * it was always zero on KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. Since KVM is now overwriting
> + * vcpu->run->hypercall.ret, ensuring that it is zero to not break QEMU.
> + */
> + vcpu->run->hypercall.ret = 0;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gpa;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = 1;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] = (op == SNP_PAGE_STATE_PRIVATE)
> @@ -3797,6 +3804,13 @@ static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
> case VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_SHARED:
> vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
> + /*
> + * In principle this should have been -KVM_ENOSYS, but userspace (QEMU <=9.2)
> + * assumed that vcpu->run->hypercall.ret is never changed by KVM and thus that
> + * it was always zero on KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. Since KVM is now overwriting
> + * vcpu->run->hypercall.ret, ensuring that it is zero to not break QEMU.
> + */
> + vcpu->run->hypercall.ret = 0;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[0] = gfn_to_gpa(gfn);
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[1] = npages;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.args[2] = entry_start.operation == VMGEXIT_PSC_OP_PRIVATE
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 2e713480933a..705fa475179f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10052,6 +10052,13 @@ unsigned long __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
>
> vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> vcpu->run->hypercall.nr = KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE;
> + /*
> + * In principle this should have been -KVM_ENOSYS, but userspace (QEMU <=9.2)
> + * assumed that vcpu->run->hypercall.ret is never changed by KVM and thus that
> + * it was always zero on KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. Since KVM is now overwriting
> + * vcpu->run->hypercall.ret, ensuring that it is zero to not break QEMU.
> + */
> + vcpu->run->hypercall.ret = 0;
As Binbin suggested, please add a helper. Copy-pasting multi-line comment is
especially ugly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists