[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee6bbbb3-f91b-4568-aeec-11d773ae4df3@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 12:03:47 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil
<hverkuil@...all.nl>, Suresh Vankadara <quic_svankada@...cinc.com>,
Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>,
Trishansh Bhardwaj <quic_tbhardwa@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "media: qcom: camss: Restructure
camss_link_entities"
On 15/12/2024 11:58, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 12/15/24 02:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> This reverts commit cc1ecabe67d92a2da0b0402f715598e8dbdc3b9e.
>>
>> This commit has a basic flaw in that it relies on camss->res->csid_num
>> as a
>> control to index the array camss->vfe[i].
>>
>> Testing on a platform where csid_num > vfe_num showed this bug up.
>>
>> camss->vfe should only be indexed by camss->res->vfe_num. Since this
>> commit
>> is meant to make the code be more readable reverting will simply restore
>> the previous correct bounds checking.
>>
>> We can make another pass at making camss_link_entities look prettier but,
>> for now we should zap the bug introduced.
>>
>> Fixes: cc1ecabe67d9 ("media: qcom: camss: Restructure
>> camss_link_entities")
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>
> This change is very welcome.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir
Mauro.
Hans would normally merge for us in CAMSS but, he's on Xmas holidays.
Could I impose upon you to pick this one up directly ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists