[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be6ab9045b893b25bd0cb27e100bd5905fdc9281.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 05:42:45 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn
<lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, Yu Jiaoliang
<yujiaoliang@...o.com>, WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] scripts/spelling.txt: add GPL-2.0+
On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 13:41 +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/15/24 11:51, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 03:51 +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > The correct SPDX identifier for the 'GNU General Public License v2.0 or
> > > later' is GPL-2.0-or-later.
> >
> > I think this unnecessary as there's a separate script
> > to check the appropriate SPDX uses treewide and there
> > isn't a single existing use of "gpl-2.0+' in the tree.
>
> Hello Joe,
>
> In next-20241213 I find 5143 occurrences with
>
> git grep -ni 'gpl-2\.0+' | wc -l
So no uses of 'gpl-2.0+' but many of 'GPL-2.0+'
And perhaps read this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wi2bdXuYhC9bd9FShtcf_u-6RUb3Qr_aXq3XtbCxR5NGQ@mail.gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists