[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241215161322.460832-1-guoren@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 11:13:22 -0500
From: guoren@...nel.org
To: paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com,
guoren@...nel.org,
bjorn@...osinc.com,
conor@...nel.org,
leobras@...hat.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com,
atishp@...osinc.com,
apatel@...tanamicro.com
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
parri.andrea@...il.com,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for KVM guests
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Add a static key controlling whether virt_spin_lock() should be
called or not. When running on bare metal set the new key to
false.
The VM guests should fall back to a Test-and-Set spinlock,
because fair locks have horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
The virt_spin_lock_key would shortcut for the queued_spin_lock_-
slowpath() function that allow virt_spin_lock to hijack it.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
index 6c82318065cf..076ae2eb15a1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
@@ -55,6 +55,21 @@ enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MIMPID,
};
+enum sbi_ext_base_impl_id {
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_BBL = 0,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_OPENSBI,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_XVISOR,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_RUSTSBI,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_DIOSIX,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_COFFER,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_XEN,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_POLARFIRE,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_COREBOOT,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_OREBOOT,
+ SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_BHYVE,
+};
+
enum sbi_ext_time_fid {
SBI_EXT_TIME_SET_TIMER = 0,
};
@@ -444,6 +459,7 @@ static inline int sbi_console_getchar(void) { return -ENOENT; }
long sbi_get_mvendorid(void);
long sbi_get_marchid(void);
long sbi_get_mimpid(void);
+long sbi_get_firmware_id(void);
void sbi_set_timer(uint64_t stime_value);
void sbi_shutdown(void);
void sbi_send_ipi(unsigned int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
index e5121b89acea..bcbb38194237 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -42,6 +42,31 @@ SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+#include <asm/jump_label.h>
+
+/*
+ * The KVM guests fall back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks
+ * have horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues. The test_and_set_spinlock_key
+ * would shortcut for the queued_spin_lock_slowpath() function that allow
+ * virt_spin_lock to hijack it.
+ */
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(test_and_set_spinlock_key);
+
+#define virt_spin_lock test_and_set_spinlock
+static inline bool test_and_set_spinlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ if (!static_branch_likely(&test_and_set_spinlock_key))
+ return false;
+
+ do {
+ smp_cond_load_relaxed((s32 *)&lock->val, VAL == 0);
+ } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
+
+ return true;
+}
+#endif
+
#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
#endif /* __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
index 1989b8cade1b..2cbacc345e5d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline long sbi_get_spec_version(void)
return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION);
}
-static inline long sbi_get_firmware_id(void)
+long sbi_get_firmware_id(void)
{
return __sbi_base_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID);
}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 45010e71df86..7e98c1c8ff0d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -249,6 +249,16 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(test_and_set_spinlock_key);
+
+static void __init virt_spin_lock_init(void)
+{
+ if (sbi_get_firmware_id() == SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM)
+ static_branch_enable(&test_and_set_spinlock_key);
+}
+#endif
+
static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
{
char *using_ext = NULL;
@@ -274,10 +284,17 @@ static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+ virt_spin_lock_init();
+
+ if (sbi_get_firmware_id() == SBI_EXT_BASE_IMPL_ID_KVM)
+ using_ext = "using test and set\n";
+
if (!using_ext)
pr_err("Queued spinlock without Zabha or Ziccrse");
else
pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
+#endif
}
extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists