[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241215142723.3e7d22e7@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 14:27:23 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Li Li <dualli@...omium.org>
Cc: dualli@...gle.com, corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, donald.hunter@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arve@...roid.com, tkjos@...roid.com,
maco@...roid.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, brauner@...nel.org,
cmllamas@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de,
masahiroy@...nel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hridya@...gle.com, smoreland@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 1/2] binderfs: add new binder devices to
binder_devices
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:41:13 -0800 Li Li wrote:
> +/**
> + * Add a binder device to binder_devices
nit: kdoc is missing function name
> + * @device: the new binder device to add to the global list
> + *
> + * Not reentrant as the list is not protected by any locks
> + */
> +void binder_add_device(struct binder_device *device);
To be clear we do not intend to apply these patches to net-next,
looks like binder patches are mostly handled by Greg KH. Please
drop the net-next from the subject on future revisions to avoid
confusion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists