[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z2BZ7d1ojV5Gbdu1@gallifrey>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:48:45 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: jes@...ined-monkey.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-hippi@...site.dk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hippi: Remove unused hippi_neigh_setup_dev
* Simon Horman (horms@...nel.org) wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 02:26:18AM +0000, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
> >
> > hippi_neigh_setup_dev() has been unused since
> > commit e3804cbebb67 ("net: remove COMPAT_NET_DEV_OPS")
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > (I'm a little suspicious it's the only setup call removed
> > by that previous commit?)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
>
> Hi David,
>
> There is a dangling comment referring to hippi_neigh_setup_dev
> in hippi_setup().
>
> /*
> * HIPPI doesn't support broadcast+multicast and we only use
> * static ARP tables. ARP is disabled by hippi_neigh_setup_dev.
> */
>
> Could you fix that up too?
I saw that, and it raised the suspicion that I mentioned in the
commit message; is that code relying on the uncalled, removed
function to disable ARPs?
Dave
> pw-bot: changes-requested
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists