[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241216165105.56185-9-dev.jain@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:21:01 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
david@...hat.com,
willy@...radead.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Cc: ryan.roberts@....com,
anshuman.khandual@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com,
cl@...two.org,
vbabka@...e.cz,
mhocko@...e.com,
apopple@...dia.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
will@...nel.org,
baohua@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz,
srivatsa@...il.mit.edu,
haowenchao22@...il.com,
hughd@...gle.com,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
yang@...amperecomputing.com,
peterx@...hat.com,
ioworker0@...il.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
ziy@...dia.com,
jglisse@...gle.com,
surenb@...gle.com,
vishal.moola@...il.com,
zokeefe@...gle.com,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com,
21cnbao@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/12] khugepaged: Abstract PMD-THP collapse
Abstract away taking the mmap_lock exclusively, copying page contents, and
setting the PMD, into vma_collapse_anon_folio_pmd().
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
---
mm/khugepaged.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 078794aa3335..88beebef773e 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1111,58 +1111,17 @@ static int alloc_charge_folio(struct folio **foliop, struct mm_struct *mm,
return SCAN_SUCCEED;
}
-static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
- int referenced, int unmapped, int order,
- struct collapse_control *cc)
+static int vma_collapse_anon_folio_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct collapse_control *cc, pmd_t *pmd,
+ struct folio *folio)
{
+ struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+ spinlock_t *pmd_ptl, *pte_ptl;
LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
- pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
- pte_t *pte;
pgtable_t pgtable;
- struct folio *folio;
- spinlock_t *pmd_ptl, *pte_ptl;
- int result = SCAN_FAIL;
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- struct mmu_notifier_range range;
-
- VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
-
- /*
- * Before allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_lock read lock.
- * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves
- * sync compaction, and we do not need to hold the mmap_lock during
- * that. We will recheck the vma after taking it again in write mode.
- */
- mmap_read_unlock(mm);
-
- result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, order, cc);
- if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
- goto out_nolock;
-
- mmap_read_lock(mm);
- result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, order, cc);
- if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
- mmap_read_unlock(mm);
- goto out_nolock;
- }
-
- result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, address, &pmd);
- if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
- mmap_read_unlock(mm);
- goto out_nolock;
- }
-
- if (unmapped) {
- /*
- * __collapse_huge_page_swapin will return with mmap_lock
- * released when it fails. So we jump out_nolock directly in
- * that case. Continuing to collapse causes inconsistency.
- */
- result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, address, pmd,
- referenced, order);
- if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
- goto out_nolock;
- }
+ int result;
+ pmd_t _pmd;
+ pte_t *pte;
mmap_read_unlock(mm);
/*
@@ -1174,7 +1133,8 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
* mmap_lock.
*/
mmap_write_lock(mm);
- result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, order, cc);
+
+ result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, cc);
if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
goto out_up_write;
/* check if the pmd is still valid */
@@ -1206,7 +1166,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, address, &pte_ptl);
if (pte) {
result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, address, pte, cc,
- &compound_pagelist, order);
+ &compound_pagelist, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
} else {
result = SCAN_PMD_NULL;
@@ -1262,11 +1222,64 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
- folio = NULL;
-
result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
out_up_write:
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+ return result;
+}
+
+static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+ int referenced, int unmapped, int order,
+ struct collapse_control *cc)
+{
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+ int result = SCAN_FAIL;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ pmd_t *pmd;
+
+ /*
+ * Before allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_lock read lock.
+ * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves
+ * sync compaction, and we do not need to hold the mmap_lock during
+ * that. We will recheck the vma after taking it again in write mode.
+ */
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+
+ result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, order, cc);
+ if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
+ goto out_nolock;
+
+ mmap_read_lock(mm);
+ result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, order, cc);
+ if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+ goto out_nolock;
+ }
+
+ result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, address, &pmd);
+ if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+ goto out_nolock;
+ }
+
+ if (unmapped) {
+ /*
+ * __collapse_huge_page_swapin will return with mmap_lock
+ * released when it fails. So we jump out_nolock directly in
+ * that case. Continuing to collapse causes inconsistency.
+ */
+ result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, address, pmd,
+ referenced, order);
+ if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
+ goto out_nolock;
+ }
+
+ if (order == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
+ result = vma_collapse_anon_folio_pmd(mm, address, vma, cc, pmd, folio);
+
+ if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
+ folio = NULL;
+
out_nolock:
if (folio)
folio_put(folio);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists