lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173436902708.158279.3911359979093567109.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:10:27 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Animesh Agarwal <animeshagarwal28@...il.com>, 
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5645: Fix CPVDD voltage
 comment

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:54:02 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Both the ALC5645 and ALC5650 datasheets specify a recommended voltage of
> 1.8V for CPVDD, not 3.5V.
> 
> Fix the comment.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5645: Fix CPVDD voltage comment
      commit: 6f4a0fd03ce856c6d9811429b9969b4f27e2eaee

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ