[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttb3743d.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:41:42 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, Darren Hart
<dvhart@...radead.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Waiman
Long <longman@...hat.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] futex: Move the retry_private label.
On Mon, Dec 16 2024 at 00:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The label futex_requeue in futex_requeue() and futex_wake_op() is jumped
> after the lock is dropped in a retry operation.
The label is jumped?
> This assumes that the hb does not need to be hashed again. If hb is
> resized then the hb can change if the reference is dropped.
Again 'hb' and the confusion of hash bucket (hb) resize.
> Move the retry_private label before the hashing operation.
The overall explanation is not really comprehensible.
futex: Re-evaluate the hash bucket after dropping the lock
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
In futex_requeue() and futex_wake_op() the hash bucket lock is
dropped in the failure paths for handling page faults and other
error scenarios. After that the code jumps back to retry_private
which relocks the hash bucket[s] under the assumption that the hash
bucket pointer which was retrieved via futex_hash() is still valid.
With resizable private hash buckets, that assumption is not longer
true as the waiters can be moved to a larger hash in the meantime.
Move the retry_private label above the hashing function to handle
this correctly.
Or so.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists