[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiDSCtF6XoAK6t0XNcT1KjGKHJMMFw8oKr1OSS0jkLuwgL8Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:42:16 +0100
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_get_physical_device_location
when !ACPI
Hi Rafael
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 21:17, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:07 PM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Provide an implementation of acpi_get_physical_device_location that can
> > be used when CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 2b09e513ecf3..b312a72f48ad 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ acpi_status
> > acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code,
> > struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
> >
> > -acpi_status
> > -acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> > -
> > bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
> > acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
> > u64 arg);
> > @@ -60,6 +57,9 @@ bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 funcs);
> > union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid,
> > u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > +acpi_status
> > +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> > +
> > static inline union acpi_object *
> > acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev,
> > u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4,
> > @@ -1003,6 +1003,12 @@ static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
> >
> > static inline int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void) { return 0; }
> >
> > +static inline acpi_status
> > +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld)
> > +{
> > + return AE_ERROR;
> > +}
>
> I overlooked this before, sorry.
>
> It generally is not OK to use acpi_status and/or AE_ error codes
> without CONFIG_ACPI and they really only should be used in
> drivers/acpi/ (and not everywhere in there for that matter).
>
> So acpi_get_physical_device_location() needs to be redefined to return
> something different from acpi_status (preferably bool) in order to be
> used in !CONFIG_ACPI code.
Shall I redefine it to
bool acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct
acpi_pld_info **pld)/
For both the ACPI and !ACPI cases? or just for the !ACPI?
Regards!
>
> > +
> > #define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv) \
> > for (adev = NULL; false && (hid) && (uid) && (hrv); )
> >
> >
> > --
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists