[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a7948f8-b80e-463d-95ef-2f3461b96896@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:30:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Raufhake <raufhakestefan@...il.com>
Cc: sre@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, s.raufhake@...khoff.com,
s.dirkwinkel@...khoff.com, s.raufhake@...khoff.de, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] power: supply: gpio-charger: Support to disable
charger
On 13/12/2024 11:28, Stefan Raufhake wrote:
> Hallo Krzysztof,
>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:23:43AM +0000, Stefan Raufhake wrote:
>>> From: Stefan Raufhake <s.raufhake@...khoff.de>
>>>
>>> Some GPIO-controlled power supplies can be turned off (charging disabled).
>>> Support changing the charging state by setting charge_type to
>>> POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_STANDARD and disabling charging by setting
>>> charge_type to POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_TYPE_NONE. One potential use case for
>>> this is disabling battery backup on a UPS.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Raufhake <s.raufhake@...khoff.de>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/power/supply/gpio-charger.yaml | 6 +++
>>> drivers/power/supply/gpio-charger.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
>> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
>> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
>> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> </form letter>
>
> Sorry, it seems I made a mistake during the patch review process.
> Should I reply to your email about version 1 of the patch or only about
> version 2? I don't want to make another mistake and open two discussions
> at the same time.
> I hope to do better in the future.
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/gpio-charger.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/gpio-charger.yaml
>>> index 89f8e2bcb2d7..084520bfc040 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/gpio-charger.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/gpio-charger.yaml
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ properties:
>>> maxItems: 32
>>> description: GPIOs used for current limiting
>>>
>>> + enable-gpios:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> + description: GPIO is used to enable/disable the charger
>>> +
>>
>> You did not respond to my comments, nothing improved. Without
>> explanation based on hardware - which I asked - this is still a no.
>>
>> Implement and respond fully to previous feedback.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
>
> Sorry, I'm new to this and don't really know what exactly you want for the
> hardware description and how best to represent our hardware in dts.
> For the gpio power supply, it can basically be any circuit that implements
> a "fully charged" GPIO and a "disable ups" GPIO.
>
> We're using a circuit built around the LTC3350 (super capacitor ups chip):
> We use this pin to indicate that our UPS is fully charged (once the input
> is gone, it's not fully charged anymore):
> PFO (pin 38): Power-Fail Status Output. This open-drain output is pulled
> low when a power failure has occurred.
>
> For the "disable ups" GPIO, we have some external circuitry around the
> LTC3350. I can't share the schematic, but it boils down to "disable usage
> of ups" so that the device shuts down immediately when power is lost.
>
> We've implemented this in many of our devices, but first we're looking
> at [1] and [2], which we also want to upstream the device trees for.
> [1] https://www.beckhoff.com/en-en/products/ipc/embedded-pcs/cx9240-arm-r-cortex-r-a53/cx9240.html
> [2] https://www.beckhoff.com/en-en/products/ipc/embedded-pcs/cx8200-arm-r-cortex-r-a53/cx8200.html
>
> For the LTC3350, there is a separate driver posted to the Linux kernel
> mail list [3] by another devolper that we would like to use in the future,
> but without this gpio, our circuit won't work.
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=power%3A+supply%3A+ltc3350-charger
This does not address my concerns at all. Read the previous comments -
you are duplicating existing property.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists