lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9094b068-ed3a-444d-b790-e43a652ab6e9@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:33:51 +0000
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: james.clark@...aro.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] coresight: tmc: Update error logging in tmc common
 functions

On 13/12/2024 14:49, Mike Leach wrote:
> Enhance the error logging in the tmc_wait_for_tmcready() and
> tmc_flush_and_stop() to print key tmc  register values on error
> conditions to improve hardware debug information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> ---
>   .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c  | 37 +++++++++++++++----
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h   |  2 +-
>   2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> index e9876252a789..1a9299adae93 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> @@ -34,25 +34,36 @@ DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etb_devs, "tmc_etb");
>   DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etf_devs, "tmc_etf");
>   DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(etr_devs, "tmc_etr");
>   
> +#define TMC_WAIT_READY_FMT_STR "timeout while waiting for TMC to be Ready [STS=0x%04x]\n"
> +
>   int tmc_wait_for_tmcready(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
>   	struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
>   	struct csdev_access *csa = &csdev->access;
> +	u32 tmc_sts = 0;
>   
>   	/* Ensure formatter, unformatter and hardware fifo are empty */
> -	if (coresight_timeout(csa, TMC_STS, TMC_STS_TMCREADY_BIT, 1)) {
> -		dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> -			"timeout while waiting for TMC to be Ready\n");
> +	if (coresight_timeout_retval(csa, TMC_STS, TMC_STS_TMCREADY_BIT, 1,
> +				     &tmc_sts)) {
> +		dev_err(&csdev->dev, TMC_WAIT_READY_FMT_STR, tmc_sts);
>   		return -EBUSY;
>   	}
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -void tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> +int tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
>   	struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
>   	struct csdev_access *csa = &csdev->access;
> -	u32 ffcr;
> +	u32 ffcr, ffsr, tmc_sts;
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	/* note any MemErr present when stopping TMC */
> +	tmc_sts = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_STS);
> +	if (tmc_sts & TMC_STS_MEMERR)
> +		dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> +			"MemErr detected before Manual Flush; STS[0x%02x]\n",
> +			tmc_sts);
>   
>   	ffcr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_FFCR);
>   	ffcr |= TMC_FFCR_STOP_ON_FLUSH;
> @@ -60,12 +71,22 @@ void tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	ffcr |= BIT(TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT);
>   	writel_relaxed(ffcr, drvdata->base + TMC_FFCR);
>   	/* Ensure flush completes */
> -	if (coresight_timeout(csa, TMC_FFCR, TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT, 0)) {
> +	if (coresight_timeout_retval(csa, TMC_FFCR, TMC_FFCR_FLUSHMAN_BIT, 0,
> +				     &ffcr)) {
> +		ffsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_FFSR);
>   		dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> -		"timeout while waiting for completion of Manual Flush\n");
> +			"timeout while waiting for completion of Manual Flush\n");
> +		dev_err(&csdev->dev,
> +			"regs: FFCR[0x%02x] FFSR[0x%02x] STS[0x%02x]\n",
> +			ffcr, ffsr, tmc_sts);
> +		rc = -EBUSY;
>   	}
>   
> -	tmc_wait_for_tmcready(drvdata);
> +	if (tmc_wait_for_tmcready(drvdata)) {
> +		dev_err(&csdev->dev, "TMC ready error after Manual flush\n");
> +		rc = -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +	return rc;
>   }

All of this looks good to me. Do we need to move the MemErr check post 
the flush ? There is a potential chance of hitting a MemERR on flushing
and we could miss reproting those ones ?

Suzuki

>   void tmc_enable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
> index 2671926be62a..34513f07c3aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ struct tmc_sg_table {
>   
>   /* Generic functions */
>   int tmc_wait_for_tmcready(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);
> -void tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);
> +int tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);
>   void tmc_enable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);
>   void tmc_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);
>   u32 tmc_get_memwidth_mask(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ