[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7c3effb-a7e1-4a24-ac7e-f84e49eefb80@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 13:14:47 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: "bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: save two lines by using
devm_clk_get_prepared()
On 16/12/2024 13:11, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 16/12/2024 10:57, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote:
...
> This fixes the boot as you assumed.
> I suppose this should be baked in the Bartosz's original patch assumed
> it was dropped from the GPIO tree.
>
> Furthermore, this seems to be a fix to a hidden problem on original
> code.
Just a minor clarification:
"Original code" here refers to the code before the
"gpio: omap: save two lines by using devm_clk_get_prepared()"
> If the original code failed in the clk_prepare() and then deferred
> probe(), this same problem should have appeared, right?
>
> Maybe consider using Fixes - tag even if this and the original change
> got squashed. Feel free to add a:
Yours,
-- Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists