[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1885f74b-5bfb-46a3-a65f-521d974d023f@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 10:25:29 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@...dia.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Carol Soto <csoto@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow unused SGIs for drivers/modules
Hi Sudeep,
On 2024/8/13 6:33 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 09:58:34AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:39:25 +0100,
>> Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The commit 897e9e60c016 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Initial support for scheduler
>>> receiver interrupt") adds support for SGI interrupts in the FFA driver.
>>> However, the validation for SGIs in the GICv3 is too strict, causing the
>>> driver probe to fail.
>>
>> It probably is a good thing that I wasn't on Cc for this patch,
>> because I would have immediately NAK'd it. Sudeep, please consider
>> this a retrospective NAK!
>>
>
> Sure, I am happy to work on any suggestions to replace it with better/cleaner
> solution.
>
>>>
>>> This patch relaxes the SGI validation check, allowing callers to use SGIs
>>> if the requested SGI number is greater than or equal to MAX_IPI, which
>>> fixes the TFA driver probe failure.
>>>
>>> This issue is observed on NVIDIA server platform with FFA-v1.1.
>>> [ 7.918099] PTP clock support registered
>>> [ 7.922110] EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
>>> [ 7.945063] ARM FF-A: Driver version 1.1
>>> [ 7.949068] ARM FF-A: Firmware version 1.1 found
>>> [ 7.977832] GICv3: [Firmware Bug]: Illegal GSI8 translation request
>>> [ 7.984237] ARM FF-A: Failed to create IRQ mapping!
>>> [ 7.989220] ARM FF-A: Notification setup failed -61, not enabled
>>> [ 8.000198] ARM FF-A: Failed to register driver sched callback -95
>>> [ 8.011322] scmi_core: SCMI protocol bus registered
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 17 -----------------
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
>>> index 9e96f024b2f19..ecf81df2915c7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
>>> @@ -188,5 +188,22 @@ static inline bool gic_has_relaxed_pmr_sync(void)
>>> return cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +enum ipi_msg_type {
>>> + IPI_RESCHEDULE,
>>> + IPI_CALL_FUNC,
>>> + IPI_CPU_STOP,
>>> + IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
>>> + IPI_TIMER,
>>> + IPI_IRQ_WORK,
>>> + NR_IPI,
>>> + /*
>>> + * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
>>> + * with trace_ipi_*
>>> + */
>>> + IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
>>> + IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
>>> + MAX_IPI
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_GICV3_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> index 5e18fbcee9a20..373cd815d9a43 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -64,23 +64,6 @@ struct secondary_data secondary_data;
>>> /* Number of CPUs which aren't online, but looping in kernel text. */
>>> static int cpus_stuck_in_kernel;
>>>
>>> -enum ipi_msg_type {
>>> - IPI_RESCHEDULE,
>>> - IPI_CALL_FUNC,
>>> - IPI_CPU_STOP,
>>> - IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
>>> - IPI_TIMER,
>>> - IPI_IRQ_WORK,
>>> - NR_IPI,
>>> - /*
>>> - * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
>>> - * with trace_ipi_*
>>> - */
>>> - IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
>>> - IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
>>> - MAX_IPI
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> static int ipi_irq_base __ro_after_init;
>>> static int nr_ipi __ro_after_init = NR_IPI;
>>> static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __ro_after_init;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> index c19083bfb9432..0d2038d8cd311 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
>>> if(fwspec->param_count != 2)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> - if (fwspec->param[0] < 16) {
>>> + if (fwspec->param[0] < MAX_IPI) {
>>> pr_err(FW_BUG "Illegal GSI%d translation request\n",
>>> fwspec->param[0]);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> No. This is the wrong approach, and leads to inconsistent behaviour if
>> we ever change this MAX_IPI value. It also breaks 32 bit builds, and
>> makes things completely inconsistent between ACPI and DT.
>>
>> I don't know how the FFA code was tested, because I cannot see how it
>> can work.
>>
>> *IF* we are going to allow random SGIs being requested by random
>> drivers, we need to be able to do it properly. Not as a side hack like
>> this.
>
> I am open for any ideas as FF-A spec authors/architects decided to allow
> secure world to donate one of its SGI to the normal world for FF-A
> notifications.
Is there any progression on this issue? Do you think it's reasonable to revert
commit 897e9e60c016 as a temporary measure?
Kai-Heng
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists