[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241216165248.5cae6311@mordecai.tesarici.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:52:48 +0100
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:47:01 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the v6.13-rc1-rt1 patch set.
>
> Changes since v6.12-rc4-rt6
>
> - Update to 6.13-rc1
>
> - Down to 24 patches (including three new). The v6.12-rc4-rt6 release
> had 42.
Great job!
However, I found 26 patches in v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:
petr@...decai:~/src/linux> git ls-tree v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:patches | grep '\.patch$' | wc -l
26
It turns out, that these two patch files are orphaned (not listed in
series):
- netfilter-nft_counter-Use-u64_stats_t-for-statistic.patch
- riscv-add-PREEMPT_AUTO-support.patch
What is the reason to keep them around? Is it even intentional?
Petr T
Powered by blists - more mailing lists