[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241217151339.gjpdkfbechdjohza@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:13:39 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v11 5/9] mfd: an8855: Add support for Airoha
AN8855 Switch MFD
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> We can see that:
> - as suggested regmap doesn't cause any performance penality. It does
> even produce better result.
> - the read/set/restore implementation gives worse performance.
>
> So I guess I will follow the path of regmap + cache page. What do you
> think?
I'm not seeing results with the "times" variable changed, but in
general, I guess the "switch regmap + page" and "switch regmap + phy
regmap" will remain neck and neck in terms of performance, surpassing
the "switch regmap restore" techniques more and more as "times"
increases. So going with a PHY regmap probably sounds good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists