[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6110fdb-cc43-4351-be43-63d251fefca5@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:08:05 +0100
From: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ggo@...edocomputers.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Avoid putting some root ports into D3 on some
Ryzen chips
Am 17.12.24 um 16:58 schrieb Werner Sembach:
>
> Am 17.12.24 um 15:11 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
>> On 12/17/2024 08:07, Werner Sembach wrote:
>>
>>>> '''
>>>> Platform may hang resuming. Upgrade your firmware or add pcie_port_pm=off
>>>> to kernel command line if you have problems
>>>> '''
>>> Yes, full log attached (kernel 6.13-rc3 one time without sudo one time with
>>> sudo)
>>
>> Yes; I see it in your log.
>>
>>>> "quirk: disabling D3cold for suspend"
>>> On the fixed BIOS I see that line. On the unfixed BIOS it aborts the
>>> functions at "if (pm_suspend_target_state == PM_SUSPEND_ON)". Skipping the
>>> check on the unfixed BIOS it still hangs on resume.
>>>>
>>>> I'm /suspecting/ you do see it, but you're having problems with another
>>>> root port.
>>>>
>>>> I mentioned this in my previous iterations of patches that eventually
>>>> landed on that quirk, but Windows and Linux handle root ports differently
>>>> at suspend time and that could be why it's exposing your BIOS bug.
>>>>
>>>> If you can please narrow down which root ports actually need the quirk for
>>>> your side (feel free to do a similar style to 7d08f21f8c630) I think we
>>>> could land on something more narrow and upstreamable.
>>>>
>>>> At a minimum what you're doing today is covering both Rembrandt and Phoenix
>>>> and it should only apply to Phoenix.
>>>
>>> I also try to find out how many devices where actually shipped with this
>>> very first BIOS version.
>>
>> OK.
>
> Ok found out that the initial bios actually works, then there is one in
> between bios where it doesn't and the next one it works again.
>
> So i need to find out if the the in between bios was actually shipped, if not,
> this issue is actually void.
>
Dang it: seems like it.
So should i create a v3 of the patch with the correct pci ids just for this bios
version?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists