[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50e4aab7-d262-48a0-b956-2c2df0faeb25@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:17:01 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: yeoreum.yun@....com, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: docs: Remove target sink from examples
On 12/12/2024 7:38 pm, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2024 7:27 AM, James Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/2024 6:01 pm, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> I thought I'd mention this issue with multicore self-hosted trace. The
>>> perf command line syntax does not allow a sink "type" to be specified
>>> (e.g. @tmc_etf or @tmc_etr). For multicore, it doesn't make sense to
>>> specify a processor mapped sink as would be the case for single core
>>> trace. A sink "type" should be allowed to avoid the auto select default.
>>> In our case, the default is the ETF sink.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve C.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sure it would be possible to add support for this, but I'm wondering
>> if the real issue is that the default selection logic is wrong? Are you
>> saying the default you get is ETF but you want ETR? And there is both
>> for each ETM? The default selection logic isn't easy to summarize but it
>> should prefer ETR (sysmem) over ETF (link sink), see coresight_find_sink().
>>
>> It's probably better to fix that rather than add a new sink selection
>> feature. Maybe if you shared a diagram of your coresight architecture it
>> would help.
>>
>> Thanks
>> James
>
> Hi James,
>
> It appears the default sink selection is ETF for multicore trace. In any
> case, for the ArmĀ® CoreSight Base System Architecture STC Level
> compliance, I need to be able to specify the sink type.
Yep it makes sense to add support for selecting it then then, I will put
it on the list but not sure about the priority. I think looking into why
the default isn't working is more important for now.
>
> The Ampere CoreSight hierarchy is described to the ACPI as follows:
>
>
> +-----------------+
> | |
> | ETM |
> | |
> +--------+--------+
> |
> |
> +--------+--------+
> | |
> | ETF |
> | |
> +--------+--------+
> |
> |
> +--------+--------+
> | |
> | ETR |
> | |
> +--------+--------+
> |
> |
> +--------+--------+
> | |
> | CATU |
> | |
> +--------+--------+
>
> Steve C.
>
I recreated this in the test here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20241217171132.834943-1-james.clark@linaro.org/T/#u
But it looks like it correctly selects ETR rather than ETF, so I'm not
sure what the difference is between your setup and that. If you can have
a look at that test and compare it that would be very helpful.
Thanks
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists