[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0a539e7-0f1b-496a-9848-73a7ada66bfb@lankhorst.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:37:22 +0100
From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...khorst.se>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Friedrich Vock <friedrich.vock@....de>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] kernel/cgroups: Add "dmem" memory accounting
cgroup.
Den 2024-12-17 kl. 18:11, skrev Tejun Heo:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 03:28:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Now that all patches look good, what is needed to merge the series? Without
>> patch 6/7 as it is a hack for testing.
>
> There were some questions raised about device naming. One thing we want to
> get right from the beginning is the basic interface.
>
> Thanks.
>
I believe it was solved. The conclusion appears to be that we go with
how we defined it in this series. drm/$pciid/$regionname. With the only
regions defined now being VRAM. Main memory will be a followup, but
requires some discussions on hwo to be prevent double accounting, and
what to do with the limited amount of mappable memory.
Cheers,
~Maarten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists