[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241217211505.7f9c9e4e@minigeek.lan>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:15:05 +0000
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec
<jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Michael
Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: sunxi: Export PLL_VIDEO_2X and
PLL_MIPI
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:00:45 -0800
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com> wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:34:57PM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > > These will be used to explicitly select TCON0 clock parent in dts
> > >
> > > Fixes: ca1170b69968 ("clk: sunxi-ng: a64: force select PLL_MIPI in TCON0 mux")
> > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.h | 2 --
> > > include/dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a64-ccu.h | 2 +
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> > You cannot combine these changes.
>
> The patch basically moves defines out from ccu-sun50i-a64.h to
> sun50i-a64-ccu.h. How do I split the change without introducing
> compilation failure?
You can just have the binding part first, adding the (same) definition
to the binding headers. As long as the #define's are not conflicting,
this is fine.
Then remove the now redundant definitions in the kernel headers, with a
subsequent patch.
Cheers,
Andre
>
> > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then please
> > run 'scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict' and (probably) fix more warnings.
> > Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run, but the code
> > here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the warning
> > is not clear.
>
> Yeah, it is not clear what do you want me to do, assuming the previous
> similar change to sun50i-a64-ccu.h did essentially the same, see
> 71b597ef5d46a326fb0d5cbfc1c6ff1d73cdc7f9
>
> Regards,
> Vasily
>
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists