[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241217003948.ghnfuns3h7qdjrfr@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:39:48 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Faizal Rahim <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 5/9] igc: Add support to set MAC Merge data via
ethtool
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 08:13:39PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Maybe the methodology for calculating these is used here?
I wanted to say: "a different methodology is used here?", sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists