[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e4e8a02-5fc1-4b90-ad9d-9f9ec5c8bc61@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 06:31:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Charan.Pedumuru@...rochip.com
Cc: lee@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,at91sam9260: Convert to json
schema
On 17/12/2024 06:00, Charan.Pedumuru@...rochip.com wrote:
>>
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9260-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9261-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9263-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9rl-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9g45-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9n12-matrix
>>> + - atmel,at91sam9x5-matrix
>>> + - atmel,sama5d3-matrix
>>> + - const: syscon
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: microchip,sam9x60-matrix
>>> + - const: atmel,at91sam9x5-matrix
>>> + - const: syscon
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: microchip,sam9x7-matrix
>> So that's just enum with previous group.
>
> Yes, as both boards have 2 compatibles one after another, I defined them
> as two different groups to resolve dt_check warnings.
My comment stands. I understand your "Yes" means you will fix it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists